你们好，我在课程分享区的经济选课焚诀进行了大量评论。可见我是一个对经济学有些爱好的人。
说到经济学社团， 肯定第一个想到方圆经济社。此社团主要还是讲解主流经济学。
但是，其实主流经济学在经济学届已经monopoly，完全不是一个competitive market。这可害苦了很多非主流经济学。
所以我号召各位对非主流有兴趣的同学，一起来到"平准学社"批判主流经济学。把主流经济学拉下神坛！！
平准学社在云平台社会科学类注册，欢迎加入。
1 个赞
事实上主要是考试只考主流经济学吧
是啊这不代表考的就是对的
支持~
粘贴一个我的主流经济学批判（
The critic of mainstream economics
according to economics for IB diploma second edition
this book gives us a straight and turn definition the resource is finite as factors of production is finished while wants and needs are infinite. As the result, scarcity always happens, which means it is impossible for mainstream economists to imagine the plenty of things. This horrible statement implies that any sufficiency cannot be attributed to the allocation of resource which as another way of saying resource is relatively scarce but can be considered as absolute scarcity of resource. T be simple pull people are Paul because they deserve it. This is a modern version of Malthusian theory. These economists teach us a lesson :
to deny the presence of any exploitation, start from construct the concept of absolute scarcit y.
“Economics is the city of choices leading to the best possible use of scores resources in order to best satisfy on limited human needs and w ants.”
I’m sorry to argue that not a single world in this sentence is true. mainstream economics refuse to improve the situation of scarcity, which is relative scarcity made by class inequality, but claim it is a subject to find a best way. Unfortunately, the latter it’s not true neither. Capitalism relies on capital valorization but not on satisfying others capital Satisfied itself by increasing itself while necessarily exploiting prole tariat.
“As you can see from this definition of economics… with the objective of determining what is in societies best int erests.”
Society space interests what a charming description but why consider so called society as a comprehension with same interests. Society is a conflict to be straight forward society is best interests are the interests of bourgeoisie but not pro letariat.
“Since the amount of output people can get depends on a how much of it, they can buy which Inter depends on the amount of income they have”
never ask if people deserve t heir inc ome
"Land
Natural resources are also called ‘gif t of nature’"
‘Gift of nature’ is an actual gift of physiocrat which cause failure of discrimination of use va lue and value.
如果感兴趣的话我建议先去学经济学史，看一下各个school是怎么发展的，现在我们学的主要是classical和neo-classical，里面的有一些concept是被后续其他的school推翻的，可以看一下new-keysian和insititution.
很多我们学的econ只是这个学科的basic就像你小时候学物理化学里面有些概念都是错的一样
如果你有兴趣可以关注一下fyec，我们后续可能会有一些相关的活动
你要学习埃尔多安经济学吗
我在fyec里面，但是活动时间和本部初中全部冲突，没法去，真是遗憾。
主流经济学批判第二集（
WHY MARKET
They claim that market-oriented system is the best for allocating limited resources, although sometimes market failed which results in that government invention, which is a kind of command component, is essential. Market leads to the best efficiency but not the best in equity, they admit. Let’s just acknowledge market is the most efficient. However, we must consider why efficiency is prior to equity. Mainstream economists argue that limited resources must show their best utility. Here is another question: resources are limited but enough to meet needs and wants. As a result, equity is more important than efficiency.
Some people are experiencing starvation, it’s not because the amount of food is inadequate, it’s because the “society” doesn’t consider starved people as “wants and needs”. “Society” choose to neglect human being’s starvation .
你打算学习什么流派的经济学
米莱经济学